<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Software Update Server &#8211; using launchd and sed to ensure off-net transfers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.networkjack.info/blog/2007/01/07/software-update-server-using-launchd-and-sed-to-ensure-off-net-transfers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.networkjack.info/blog/2007/01/07/software-update-server-using-launchd-and-sed-to-ensure-off-net-transfers/</link>
	<description>A Jack of All Nets' experience in the world of networked systems.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 01:32:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Blood</title>
		<link>http://www.networkjack.info/blog/2007/01/07/software-update-server-using-launchd-and-sed-to-ensure-off-net-transfers/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Blood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkjack.info/blog/archives/8#comment-197</guid>
		<description>unfortunately, that would have a far more reaching effect (and possible unintended consequences) than the specific instance I need to remedy here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unfortunately, that would have a far more reaching effect (and possible unintended consequences) than the specific instance I need to remedy here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanderw</title>
		<link>http://www.networkjack.info/blog/2007/01/07/software-update-server-using-launchd-and-sed-to-ensure-off-net-transfers/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>sanderw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkjack.info/blog/archives/8#comment-191</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a little more complex, but this might also be a good candidate for a proxy server. That way you&#039;d have a single place to administer any other hostname swaps you might want/need to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a little more complex, but this might also be a good candidate for a proxy server. That way you&#8217;d have a single place to administer any other hostname swaps you might want/need to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Blood</title>
		<link>http://www.networkjack.info/blog/2007/01/07/software-update-server-using-launchd-and-sed-to-ensure-off-net-transfers/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Blood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkjack.info/blog/archives/8#comment-188</guid>
		<description>My primary purpose is to not pollute our traffic graphs and billing scripts with traffic that is merely running from one server to another as it&#039;s not traffic that we have to ultimately pay for and bill the client for.

Secondary purpose is to be able to download the updates over a much faster network as most of our client&#039;s colo boxen are only connected via a 10 mbit link whereas the backside is on GigE.

As for your hosts file change, I&#039;d rather not override host names published by other entities.

Having a deterministic way of forcing data traffic to the backside gige network by using slightly altering the existing processes has a much smaller footprint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My primary purpose is to not pollute our traffic graphs and billing scripts with traffic that is merely running from one server to another as it&#8217;s not traffic that we have to ultimately pay for and bill the client for.</p>
<p>Secondary purpose is to be able to download the updates over a much faster network as most of our client&#8217;s colo boxen are only connected via a 10 mbit link whereas the backside is on GigE.</p>
<p>As for your hosts file change, I&#8217;d rather not override host names published by other entities.</p>
<p>Having a deterministic way of forcing data traffic to the backside gige network by using slightly altering the existing processes has a much smaller footprint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanderw</title>
		<link>http://www.networkjack.info/blog/2007/01/07/software-update-server-using-launchd-and-sed-to-ensure-off-net-transfers/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>sanderw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkjack.info/blog/archives/8#comment-183</guid>
		<description>Not 100% sure I understand what you&#039;re wanting to do, but couldn&#039;t you just update your /etc/hosts entry (/private/etc/hosts on the Mac, I think) to point to a different IP for swcdn.apple.com? 

I guess it depends on if you&#039;d ever want to go to the original address.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not 100% sure I understand what you&#8217;re wanting to do, but couldn&#8217;t you just update your /etc/hosts entry (/private/etc/hosts on the Mac, I think) to point to a different IP for swcdn.apple.com? </p>
<p>I guess it depends on if you&#8217;d ever want to go to the original address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
