<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Failing 180GB Xserve hard drives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.networkjack.info/blog/2007/12/20/failing-180gb-xserve-hard-drives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.networkjack.info/blog/2007/12/20/failing-180gb-xserve-hard-drives/</link>
	<description>A Jack of All Nets' experience in the world of networked systems.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Not a tech Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.networkjack.info/blog/2007/12/20/failing-180gb-xserve-hard-drives/#comment-4766</link>
		<dc:creator>Not a tech Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkjack.info/blog/2007/12/20/failing-180gb-xserve-hard-drives/#comment-4766</guid>
		<description>That's great news. Have a quartet of 500gb Barracuda drives on the way.

Thanks for the clarification/help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great news. Have a quartet of 500gb Barracuda drives on the way.</p>
<p>Thanks for the clarification/help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Blood</title>
		<link>http://www.networkjack.info/blog/2007/12/20/failing-180gb-xserve-hard-drives/#comment-4765</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Blood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 02:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkjack.info/blog/2007/12/20/failing-180gb-xserve-hard-drives/#comment-4765</guid>
		<description>You can definitely use them in all G4 Xserves.

The ATA/100 vs 133 is not an issue at all.

No need to buy new modules, you can easily replace the drive inside the existing module with any standard IDE/PATA drive.

Only the &lt;a href="/blog/2007/10/19/apple-firmware-hard-drives-use-with-xserve-g5-hardware-raid-pci-card/" rel="nofollow"&gt;G5 Xserve Hardware RAID cards&lt;/a&gt; have shown any pickiness over the drives installed.

And thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can definitely use them in all G4 Xserves.</p>
<p>The ATA/100 vs 133 is not an issue at all.</p>
<p>No need to buy new modules, you can easily replace the drive inside the existing module with any standard IDE/PATA drive.</p>
<p>Only the <a href="/blog/2007/10/19/apple-firmware-hard-drives-use-with-xserve-g5-hardware-raid-pci-card/" rel="nofollow">G5 Xserve Hardware RAID cards</a> have shown any pickiness over the drives installed.</p>
<p>And thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not a tech Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.networkjack.info/blog/2007/12/20/failing-180gb-xserve-hard-drives/#comment-4763</link>
		<dc:creator>Not a tech Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkjack.info/blog/2007/12/20/failing-180gb-xserve-hard-drives/#comment-4763</guid>
		<description>Can you run these Seagate ATA-100 drives in the Dual 1.33 GHz PPC G4 rack servers? They have Ultra ATA/133 drives. The first bay is a 60GB, the other three are 175GB IBMs All original and we really want to replace them before they die.

Found a couple new drive modules but $600/each vs $125 for a drive? Would rather mount new drives to the module.

Thanks for any assistance.

btw, awesome blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you run these Seagate ATA-100 drives in the Dual 1.33 GHz PPC G4 rack servers? They have Ultra ATA/133 drives. The first bay is a 60GB, the other three are 175GB IBMs All original and we really want to replace them before they die.</p>
<p>Found a couple new drive modules but $600/each vs $125 for a drive? Would rather mount new drives to the module.</p>
<p>Thanks for any assistance.</p>
<p>btw, awesome blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
